LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY“INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL AND LEGAL CONSULTING”ARTUR IOFFE LAW OFFICE
  1. Home
  2. Litigations

Litigations

This section presents court judgments in some of the cases handled by our team.

Constitutional Court of Ukraine

  1. Judgment dated 12.01.2010 in the case No 1-2/2010 based on International Financial and Legal Consulting LLC’s constitutional inquiry regarding official interpretation of the provision of Article 99 (3) of the Civil Code of Ukraine (the case concerning dismissal of the company’s top manager).
  2. Judgment dated 02.07.2002 in the case No 1-8/2002 based on Stirol Concern OJSC’s constitutional inquiry regarding official interpretation of the provision stated in the indent one of Article 12 (1) (1) of the Code of Commercial Procedure of Ukraine (the case concerning disputing of acts in a commercial court).

Ukrainian commercial courts

  1. Judgment dated 10.12.2025 in the case No 908/3121/25 (concerning recovery of UAH 686,690.40 in debt for delivered products).
  2. Judgment dated 17.09.2025 in the case No 911/1631/25 (concerning recovery of UAH 8,464,250.00 in losses claimed by a former member of a limited liability company).
  3. Judgment dated 01.04.2025 in the case No 911/120/25 (concerning an obligation to provide documents confirming the market value of the share of a member that had withdrawn from a limited liability company). The judgment was upheld by the Supreme Court’s resolution dated 17.09.2025.
  4. Judgment dated 07.10.2024 in the case No 910/7425/24 (concerning recovery of UAH 460,027.00 in losses claimed on the grounds that the cost of design works had been overstated).
  5. Judgment dated 14.06.2024 in the case No 927/404/24 (concerning recovery of UAH 202,099.05 in material damage caused by a road traffic accident).
  6. Judgment dated 16.04.2024 in the case No 911/3230/23 (concerning a claim filed by a former member of a limited liability company demanding recovery of UAH 7,483,800.00 in dividends).
  7. Judgment dated 08.09.2023 in the case No 927/594/23 (concerning recovery of debt under a loan agreement claimed by a new creditor that had acquired the claim within the liquidation procedure of a commercial bank).
  8. Judgment dated 20.03.2019 in the case No 910/16669/18 (concerning a claim filed by the Deposit Guarantee Fund demanding recovery of debt under a loan agreement within the liquidation procedure of a commercial bank). The judgment was upheld by the Supreme Court’s resolution dated 05.12.2019.
  9. Judgment dated 09.07.2016 in the case No 911/1281/16 concerning a complaint filed by the First Deputy Prosecutor for the Kyiv Oblast on behalf of the state represented by Boryspil Raion State Administration in the Kyiv Oblast demanding invalidation of resolutions, cancelation of state registration of ownership and return of land plots (legal support to one of the defendants).
  10. Judgment dated 07.10.2015 in the case No 922/4280/15 (concerning a complaint demanding recognition as a creditor and collection of UAH 1,234,758.00 from Polimer-Mekhanika Technical Center, Limited Liability Company).
  11. Judgment dated 10.12.2012 in the case No 22-ц/2390/3311 (concerning protection of consumer rights and protection of retail company’s rights, based on a complaint filed by an individual regarding an engine purchase).
  12. Judgment dated 30.06.2009 in the case No 5/62/09 (concerning a complaint filed by DV Oil and Gas Production Company LLC demanding collection of UAH 434,810.25 in outstanding debt owed by Zaporizhia Ferroalloy Plant OJSC under a supply contract).
  13. Judgment dated 05.08.2008 in the case No 339/19-04/20-08 (concerning a complaint filed by FM Logistic Dnipro, a subsidiary of FM Logistic JSC demanding invalidation of a tax resolution notice assessing a profit tax liability).
  14. Judgment dated 16.01.2008 in the case No 10/657-07 (concerning invalidation of a land lease agreement due to the absence of required scope of legal capacity in a body of local self-government).
  15. Judgment dated 14.07.2005 in the case No 28/480-11/223 (concerning a flat tax payer’s complaint demanding invalidation of a tax resolution notice assessing a land tax liability).
  16. Judgment dated 01.03.2005 in the case No 33/445 (concerning a complaint filed by Brokbiznesinvest Pension Fund Administrator Asset Management Company CJSC demanding invalidation of a tax resolution notice charging a penalty for the failure to notify tax authorities about the opening of bank accounts).

Ukrainian administrative courts

  1. Judgment dated 03.06.2025 in the case No 240/16908/24 (concerning invalidation and cancellation of tax resolution notices). The judgment was upheld by the court of appeal’s resolution dated 09.12.2025.
  2. Resolution of the court of appeal dated 22.12.2022 in the case No 320/489/22 (concerning invalidation and cancellation of tax resolution notices). The resolution was upheld by the Supreme Court’s resolution dated 18.07.2024.
  3. Judgment dated 18.02.2019 in the case No 620/3920/18 concerning a complaint filed by Novhorod-Siverskyi Milk, Agricultural Production Cooperative against the Directorate of the State Labor Service for the Chernihiv Oblast, demanding recognition as unlawful and cancelation of a resolution charging a penalty of UAH 893,520.00.
  4. Judgment dated 13.02.2018 in the case No 826/11867/17 concerning a complaint against the Main Directorate of the State Fiscal Service for Kyiv demanding cancelation of a tax resolution notice ordering collection of UAH 11,189.08 in land tax (the case concerning collection of land tax from the owner of a nonresidential premise in an apartment building).
  5. Resolution dated 28.02.2013 in the case No 2а-2398/12/1070 (concerning invalidation of a tax resolution notice, disputing legality of attributing the negative value of a taxable asset in the previous reporting (tax) period in the amount of UAH 12,470,914.00).

Ukrainian general courts

  1. Judgment dated 30.04.2025 in the case No 487/6386/14-ц (a case between a citizen of Ukraine and a citizen of the USA concerning paternity of a minor child; as a result, the US citizen’s paternity was found to be unfounded and the paternity details were removed from the child’s birth record).
  2. Judgment dated 21.04.2023 in the case No 359/520/23 (concerning a claim filed by a dismissed employee demanding recovery of wage arrears).
  3. Judgment dated 02.06.2022 and resolution of the court of appeal dated 01.12.2022 in the case No 756/4994/21 (concerning removal of obstacles to the use of the common property of an apartment building and an obligation of the offender to dismantle the unauthorized construction).
  4. Resolution of the Kyiv Court of Appeal dated 03.11.2020 in the case No 2608/7123/12 (concerning protection of the interests of co-owners of an apartment building in connection with unauthorized construction carried out by one of the apartment owners). The resolution was upheld by the Supreme Court’s resolution dated 29.09.2021.

International Commercial Court of Arbitration under the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry

  1. Judgment dated 23.03.2011 in the case АС No 346у/2010 (concerning a complaint filed by Air Conditioning & Heating International FZE (UAE) against El-Invest LLC (Ukraine), demanding collection of USD 132,140.00).
  2. Judgment dated 31.07.2009 in the case АС No 110э/2009 (concerning a complaint filed by El-Invest LLC (Ukraine) against Air Conditioning & Heating International FZE (UAE), demanding collection of USD 272,274).
  3. Judgment dated 21.02.2003 in the case АС No 378у/2002 (concerning a complaint filed by BASF-Aktiengesellschaft (Germany) against Simferopol Raiagrokhim OJSC (Ukraine), demanding collection of USD 102,090.88).
+38 (044) 230-01-65
17/25 Hertsena Str., office 1704050, Kyiv, Ukraine
Contact us
on map